Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser et al.; and The Joachim Hendrik Fisser v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., 1958 — 357 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
General
Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser et al.; and The Joachim Hendrik Fisser v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc.
357 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 968.
No. 971.
Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser et al.; and The Joachim Hendrik Fisser v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc.
Abraham E. Freedman for petitioner in No. 968. John H. Dougherty for petitioner in No. 971, and The Joachim Hendrik Fisser et al., respondents in No. 968. John J. Monigan, Jr. for the Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 249 F. 2d 818.