Tax
J. M. Moore and Hattie Moore, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
15 B.T.A. 1037·United States Board of Tax Appeals·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. M. Moore and Hattie Moore, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 28853.
Promulgated March 22, 1929.
J. M. Moore for the petitioners.
Brice Toole, Esq., for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Milliken :]
OPINION.
Milliken :
Our findings of fact result from the admission by respondent of the allegations of fact set forth in the petition filed in this cause. Petitioners filed a joint Federal income-tax return for the calendar year 1925, and seek by this proceeding to have us hold that the respondent was in error in refusing to accept amended income-tax returns which were subsequently tendered to the respondent. We have decided the identical question adversely to the iieti-tioners’ contentions in R. Downes, Jr., 5 B. T. A. 1029, and William A. Buttolph, 7 B. T. A. 310. See also Buttolph v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 29 Fed. (2d) 695, and Grant v. Rose, 24 Fed. (2d) 115.
Judgment will Toe entered for the respondent.