General
SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. Minnie DANIEL
228 Ala. 699153 So. 918·Alabama Supreme Court·1934·AL
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
153 So. 918
SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. Minnie DANIEL.
7 Div. 233.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 29, 1934.
Wm. B. McCollough, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Culli & Culli and Joe F. Duke, all of Gadsden, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — FOSTER, Justice.]
FOSTER, Justice.
The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.
No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.