Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jennie Kelly, Appellant, v. Edward M. Moore et al., Defendants. James J. Nealis, as Receiver, Respondent, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 647 · caselaw · US
General
Jennie Kelly, Appellant, v. Edward M. Moore et al., Defendants. James J. Nealis, as Receiver, Respondent
173 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jennie Kelly, Appellant, v. Edward M. Moore et al., Defendants. James J. Nealis, as Receiver, Respondent.
Kelly v. Moore, 74 App. Div. 636, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 9, 1903;
decided February 24, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1902, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term passing the accounts of the receiver herein.
Jacob Fromme for appellant.
Peter Eagan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.