General
Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Company, Respondent, v. Samuel Singley, Appellant
137 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Company, Respondent, v. Samuel Singley, Appellant.
(Argued January 23, 1893;
decided February 10, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 11, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Rowland Cox for appellant.
Alex S. Bacon for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.