General
Garfinkle et vir v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Wells Fargo Bank et al., Real Parties in Interest)
439 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-397.
Garfinkle et vir v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Wells Fargo Bank et al., Real Parties in Interest).
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.