General
City of Rochester, Plaintiff, v. Holmsten Ice Rinks, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, et al., Third-Party Defendant
155 A.D.2d 941·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1989·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
City of Rochester, Plaintiff, v Holmsten Ice Rinks, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, et al., Third-Party Defendant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with same memorandum as in City of Rochester v Holmsten Ice Rinks ([appeal No. 1] 155 AD2d 939 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.— summary judgment.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.