Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Essex, Superintendent of Public Schools of Ohio, et al. v. Wolman et al., 1972 — 406 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Essex, Superintendent of Public Schools of Ohio, et al. v. Wolman et al.
406 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist are of the opinion that the application should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-1116.
Essex, Superintendent of Public Schools of Ohio, et al. v. Wolman et al.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. S. D. Ohio. Application for stay of order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Civ. No. 71-396, presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist are of the opinion that the application should be granted.