General
Engelbert Hardt et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Lilianthal, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
150 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Engelbert Hardt et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Lilianthal, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued October 13, 1896;
decided October 27, 1896.)
Ha/rdt v. Schwab, 72 Hun, 109, affirmed.
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 28,1893, which affirmed an interlocutory and a final judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Samuel Greeribaum for appellant.
Alex. Blumensteil for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.