Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, to Compel an Accounting by Alfred L. Simonson et al., Executors, etc., 1890 — 119 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, to Compel an Accounting by Alfred L. Simonson et al., Executors, etc.
119 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, to Compel an Accounting by Alfred L. Simonson et al., Executors, etc.
(Argued March 10, 1890;
decided March 21, 1890.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 2,1889, which affirmed an order of the surrogate of the county of New York dismissing petition.
B. E. Valentine for appellant.
Edward Schenck for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.