Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission; and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 1953 — 345 U.S. 934 · caselaw · US
General
Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission; and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
345 U.S. 934·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 574.
No. 575.
Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission; and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General, and Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin, and William E. Torkelson for the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, petitioners in No. 574.
William Ryan for petitioner in No. 575.
Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.