Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al.; and Tomlinson et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, 1939 — 306 U.S. 652 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al.; and Tomlinson et al. v. Thompson, Trustee
306 U.S. 652·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Mr. -Justice Reed took no- part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 682.
No. 736.
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al.; and Tomlinson et al. v. Thompson, Trustee.
March 27, 1939.
Mr. R. B.- Caldwell for petitioner in No. 682.
Messrs. Clan Crawford, Howard F. Burns, and Jacob M. Lashly for petitioners in No. 736.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari'to the Circuit Court.of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mr. -Justice Reed took no- part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Messrs. William B. Cockley, Godfrey Goldmark, and Henry N. Ess for respondents.
Reported below: 24 F. Supp. 729.