General
R. L. HALL, Appellant, v. RICHFIELD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Wm. C. McDuffie, as Receiver for RICHFIELD OIL COMPANY, Appellees
70 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R. L. HALL, Appellant, v. RICHFIELD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Wm. C. McDuffie, as Receiver for RICHFIELD OIL COMPANY, Appellees.
No. 7481.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 21, 1934.
James T. Boyle and Franklin W. Peck, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of parties, ordered appeal dismissed, without costs; mandate forthwith.