Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dorsey v. United States; and Hill v. United States, 2011 — 565 U.S. 1077 · caselaw · US
General
Dorsey v. United States; and Hill v. United States
565 U.S. 1077·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 29, 2011
No. 11-5683.
No. 11-5721.
Dorsey v. United States; and Hill v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. [Certio-rari granted, ante, p. 1057.] Miguel A. Estrada, Esq., of Washington, D. C., is invited to brief and argue these cases as amicus curiae in support of the judgments below.