Contracts · MBE-tested
Laurence M. Svirchev, PVT, U. S. Army v. BG James T. Hollingsworth as Commanding General of Fort Jackson, South Carolina and MG Willard Pearson as Commanding General of Forth Lewis, Washington
18 C.M.A. 650·United States Court of Military Appeals·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
September 15, 1969
No. 69-42
Laurence M. Svirchev, PVT, U. S. Army v BG James T. Hollingsworth as Commanding General of Fort Jackson, South Carolina and MG Willard Pearson as Commanding General of Forth Lewis, Washington.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the “Motion to Reconsider” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that no facts sufficient to establish a basis for the relief requested are alleged, it is, by the Court, this 15th day of September, 1969,
ORDERED that said “Motion to Reconsider” be, and the same is, hereby denied. United States v Noyd, 18 USCMA 483, 40 CMR 195 and Lee v Pearson, 18 USCMA 545, 40 CMR 257.