General
Hoffman et al. v. City of Cincinnati
410 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument on issue of systematic exclusion of voters between the ages of 18 and 21 from the jury.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-897.
Hoffman et al. v. City of Cincinnati.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument on issue of systematic exclusion of voters between the ages of 18 and 21 from the jury.