Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. William S. Devery, Appellant, v. Charles H. Knox et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 589 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. William S. Devery, Appellant, v. Charles H. Knox et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents
173 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. William S. Devery, Appellant, v. Charles H. Knox et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.
People ex rel. Devery v. Knox, 72 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Submitted November 12, 1902;
decided January 6, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 20, 1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to certify upon the payroll of the police department of the city of New York that the relator is entitled to the salary of chief .of police for the months of February to August, 1901, inclusive.
Judson S. Landon, Abram I. Elkus and Carlisle J. Gleason for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed on authority of People ex rel. Devery v. Coler (173 N. Y. 103), with disbursements, but without costs.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.