Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George O. BAIRD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 1932 — 55 F.2d 1075 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George O. BAIRD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
55 F.2d 1075·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George O. BAIRD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 5891.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 19, 1932.
S. L. Herold, of Shreveport, La., for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and R. N. Shaw, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before BRYAN, POSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This eause came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that tho above entitled and numbered cause be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals for further proceedings, and was submitted to the court.
On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the above entitled and numbered cause he remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals for further proceedings to tho end that there he a recomputation of the tax liability of the petitioner herein for the years 1921 and 1922, such reeomputation to be made giving effect to the decision of this court in tho case of S. L. Herold v. Commissioner, 42 F.(2d) 942.
It is further ordered and adjudged that the mandate of this court issue without delay.