Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hermann F. M. MUTZENBECHER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sumner BALLARD, Defendant-Appellee, 1926 — 16 F.2d 174 · caselaw · US
General
Hermann F. M. MUTZENBECHER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sumner BALLARD, Defendant-Appellee
16 F.2d 174·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hermann F. M. MUTZENBECHER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sumner BALLARD, Defendant-Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 17, 1926.)
No. 106.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Wise, Whitney & Parker, of New York City (Christopher Nixon, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Rumsey & Morgan, of New York City (David Rumsey and Henry N. Arnold, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and A. N. HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (16 F.[2d] 173) affirmed in open court.