Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Donnelly, by Mary Donnelly, her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mary Burnham, Appellant, Interpleaded by The Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 546 · caselaw · US
General
Margaret Donnelly, by Mary Donnelly, her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mary Burnham, Appellant, Interpleaded by The Catholic Mutual Benefit Association
177 N.Y. 546·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Donnelly, by Mary Donnelly, her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mary Burnham, Appellant, Interpleaded by The Catholic Mutual Benefit Association.
Donnelly v. Burnham,, 86 App. Div. 226, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1908;
decided January 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 17,. 1903j- affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered .upon a .decision of the court' at a Trial Term and an order, denying a motion for á new trial. ■
Eugene W. Harrington for appellant.
Thomas H. Dowd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, and ten per cent additional under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.