General
George E. Fuechsel, Respondent, v. Anna Bellesheim et al., Appellants
111 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Fuechsel, Respondent, v. Anna Bellesheim et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 16, 1888;
decided December 4, 1888.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order which affirmed a judgment of Special Term in favor of plaintiff.
Flamen B. Gandler for motion.
Henry H. Davis opposed.
The following is the mem. of decision:
“ It does not appear that notice of this motion was served on the infants or their guardian or attorney, and for that reason, as to them, it is denied. As to the adult appellant the motion is granted, without costs.”
[MAJORITY]
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.