Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Channan Singh v. Haff, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, 1940 — 309 U.S. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Channan Singh v. Haff, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization
309 U.S. 634·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 152.
Channan Singh v. Haff, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization.
Argued March 26, 1940.
Decided April 1, 1940.
Mr. Marshall B. Woodworth submitted for petitioner.
Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. George F. Kneip, W. Marvin Smith, and Albert E. Reitzel were on the brief, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U. S. 460, 468; Zakonaite v. Wolf, 226 U. S. 272, 275; Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U. S. 149, 157.