Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William E. Wamsley, Respondent, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 591 · caselaw · US
General
William E. Wamsley, Respondent, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant
163 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William E. Wamsley, Respondent, v. The Atlas Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant.
Reported below, 50 App. Div. 199.
(Submitted June 4, 1900;
decided June 12, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 9, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered, upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment is not appealable to this court, it having been entered upon a verdict and unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, which has not ■ allowed the appeal nor certified that questions of law have arisen which should be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.
Alexander 8. Bacon for motion.
Everett P. Wheeler opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.