Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission, 1968 — 390 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
General
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission
390 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 893.
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission.
William E. Torkelson for Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and Raymond F. Simon for City of Chicago, petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schifi, Israel Convisser and Cyril S. Wofsy for Federal Power Commission. Charles C. McD'ugald and William W. Brackett for Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, intervenor below. Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., for Village of Bethany, Illinois, et al., as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.