General
KING v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
364 U.S. 445·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KING v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 4,
Misc.
Decided November 21, 1960.
Petitioner pro se.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and Leon F. Pesek and Linward Shivers, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a full hearing. Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674.