General
Louisa C. Pursley, as Administratrix of Charles S. Pursley, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edge Moor Bridge Works, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
168 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louisa C. Pursley, as Administratrix of Charles S. Pursley, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edge Moor Bridge Works, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Pursley v. Edge Moor Bridge Works, 56 App. Div. 71, affirmed.
(Argued June 11, 1901;
decided July 10, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Carl A. de Gersdorff for appellant.
Thomas P. Wickes and Charles R. La Rue for respondent.-
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ. Not sitting : Parker, Ch. J.