Property · MBE-tested
Henry C. ZELLER and Edward G. Zeller, Appellees, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Appellant
46 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry C. ZELLER and Edward G. Zeller, Appellees, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Appellant.
No. 214.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 2, 1931.
Richard H. Templeton, U. S. Atty., of Buffalo, N. Y. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Ottamar Hamele, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.
Slee, O’Brian, Hellings & Ulsh, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Ralph Ulsh, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
While this ease presents some variations in fact, they justify no further discussion than that in our opinion in Art Metal Construction Company v. United States of America 47 F.(2d) 558. The facts aro, indeed, stronger for the defendant.
For the reasons therein stated, the judgment [35 F.(2d) 870] is reversed, and the petition dismissed.