Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Church of St. Stanislaus, Respondent, v. The Algemeine Verein, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
General
Church of St. Stanislaus, Respondent, v. The Algemeine Verein, Appellant
161 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Church of St. Stanislaus, Respondent, v. The Algemeine Verein, Appellant.
Reported below, 31 App. Div. 133.
(Submitted January 8, 1900;
decided January 16, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 6, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made on the grounds that the Appellate Division unanimously decided that there was evidence sustaining, or tending to sustain, the findings of the court at Special Term; that the exceptions taken at the trial were frivolous and unavailable in this court, and that there is no question of law presented for review.
George M. Yarn, Hoesen for motion.
Abram I. JElkus opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.