General
Margaret Coyle, Respondent, v. Charles Nies, Appellant
120 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Coyle, Respondent, v. Charles Nies, Appellant.
(Submitted March 3, 1890;
decided March 18, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an- order made the first Tuesday of January, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
D. D. Bollos for appellant.
.James G. Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Bradley and Haight, J J., not sitting. Judgment affirmed.