Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles F. Gall, Respondent, v. Amelia Gall, as Administratrix of Joseph Gall, Deceased, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 696 · caselaw · US
General
Charles F. Gall, Respondent, v. Amelia Gall, as Administratrix of Joseph Gall, Deceased
160 N.Y. 696·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles F. Gall, Respondent, v. Amelia Gall, as Administratrix of Joseph Gall, Deceased.
(Argued October 3, 1899;
decided October 24, 1899.)
Gall v. Gall, 27 App. Div. 173, appeal dismissed.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May. 13, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
The motion was made upon the ground that the decision of the Appellate Division was' unanimous and the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction, the action being one to recover compensation for services rendered.
Ira Leo Bamburger for motion.
[MAJORITY]
No one opposed.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.