Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick B. Gurney, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick B. Gurney, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent
138 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick B. Gurney, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent.
(Submitted April 26, 1893;
decided June 6, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1891, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an order of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
Benj. B. Foster for appellant.
A. JD. Beott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.