Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Rothschild, Appellant, v. Robert Muh et al., Composing the Board of Assessors of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 540 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Rothschild, Appellant, v. Robert Muh et al., Composing the Board of Assessors of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
183 N.Y. 540·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Rothschild, Appellant, v. Robert Muh et al., Composing the Board of Assessors of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
(Argued November 21, 1905;
decided December 5, 1905.)
People ex rel. Rothschild v. Muh, 101 App. Div. 423, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 27, 1905, which affirmed a determination of the defendants in refusing to award the relator damages for a .change of grade of a street in front of premises of said relator $pd dismissed a writ of certiorari to review fhe sanie,
F. W. Hottenroth and Adolph C. Hottenroth for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and George L. Sterling of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, witli costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.