Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1942 — 315 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
General
Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
315 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 928.
Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
March 16, 1942.
Mr. Hersey Egginton for petitioner. Messrs. Allen T. Klots, Walter S. Logan, and G. Schuyler Tarbell, Jr. for respondent. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Melvin H. Siegel filed a memorandum on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, urging denial of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York denied.