General
Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission; and Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission
393 U.S. 829·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 125.
No. 126.
Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission; and Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
Morris Wolf for petitioner in No. 125. Arthur Littleton for petitioner Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.; Albert R. Connelly for petitioner Bethlehem Steel Corp.; Howard M. Holtzmann for petitioner CF&I Steel Corp.; C. M. Thorp, Jr., and Charles Weiss for petitioner Edge-water Steel Co.; William R. Bascom and Edwin S. Taylor for petitioner Granite City Steel Co.; Roger T. Clapp for petitioner Grinnell Corp.; Samuel D. Slade for petitioner Lukens Steel Co.; William B. Cudlip for petitioner McLouth Steel Corp.; Mr. Weiss for petitioners National Steel Corp. et al.; and W. H. Buchanan for petitioner United States Steel Corp., in No. 126. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, James Mcl. Henderson, and David B. Morris for respondent in both eases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.