Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel McFadden, Appellant, v. Herbert P. Campbell et al., Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 723 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel McFadden, Appellant, v. Herbert P. Campbell et al., Respondents
158 N.Y. 723·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel McFadden, Appellant, v. Herbert P. Campbell et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 8, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the late Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered June 20,1895, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and granting a new trial.
McFadden v. Campbell, 13 Misc. Rep. 158, appeal dismissed.
Robert O. Taylor and Jerome & Nason for appellant.
P. 8. Dudley, Thomas 8. Moore and Charles C. Nadal for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of Hoes v. Edison General Electric Co. (150 N. Y. 87).
All concur.