General
Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina et al.; and United States et al. v. North Carolina et al.
373 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 823.
No. 943.
Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina et al.; and United States et al. v. North Carolina et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Probable jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.
William T. Joyner and Earl E.Eisenhart, Jr. for appellant in No. 823. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States et al. in No. 943.
Reported below: 210 F. Supp. 675.