Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wisconsin v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc., et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 990 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wisconsin v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc., et al.
385 U.S. 990·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. · Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 659.
Wisconsin v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc., et al.
Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Arlen Christenson, Deputy Attorney General, George F. Sieker, Assistant Attorney General, Robert P. Russell, Steven E. Keane, Lloyd N. Cutler, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Max 0. Truitt, Jr., and Timothy B. Dyk for petitioner.
Ray T. McCann and Louis F. Carroll for respondents.
William G. Clark, Attorney General, for the State of Illinois, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.