Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 823 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana et al.
346 U.S. 823·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 168.
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana et al.
H. C. Pauly for petitioner. Arnold H. Olsen, Attorney General of Montana, Vera Jean Heckathorn, Assistant Attorney General, and Edwin S. Booth for the Board of Railroad Commissioners; and Lester H. Loble for the Railroad Brotherhoods of Railroad Trainmen, Engineers, Firemen and Conductors et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Montana. Certio-rari denied.