Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lazarus Levy, Respondent, v. Simon Popper, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 600 · caselaw · US
General
Lazarus Levy, Respondent, v. Simon Popper, Appellant
186 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lazarus Levy, Respondent, v. Simon Popper, Appellant.
Levy v. Popper, 106 App. Div. 394, affirmed.
(Argued November 26, 1906;
decided December 11, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 22,, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due to plaintiff for. certain stock purchased for defendant’s account.
Charles F. Willimns and Eustace Conway for appellant.
F. Sjñegelberg for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.