General
Mary L. Simmonds, Appellant, v. Edwin Simmons, Thomas M. Tyng, Respondent
75 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary L. Simmonds, Appellant, v. Edwin Simmons, Thomas M. Tyng, Respondent.
4n order refusing to punish an alleged contempt in disobeying an injunction is not appealable to this court.
(Argued December 10, 1878;
decided December 17, 1878.)
This ivas an appeal from an order of General Term reversing. an order of Special Term which adjudged the respondent Thomas M. Tyng, who was attorney for defendant, guilty of contempt in violating an injunction order herein, and punishing him therefor. Held, as above, the court citing Button v. Davis (64 N. Y., 633); Boner// Savings Bank v. Richards (63 id.’, 631) : Batter man v. Finn (40 id., 340).
Daniel Daly for appellant.
Morris A. Tyng for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Ouriam]
Per Ouriam
opinion for dismissal of appeal. All concur.
Appeal dismissed.