General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al. v. Anaconda Company et al.; and Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al.
361 U.S. 864·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 298.
No. 311.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al. v. Anaconda Company et al.; and Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al.
David L. Holland, Russell B. Day and Harold C. Heiss for petitioners in No; 298. William N. Geagan for petitioner in No. 311. Nathan Witt for International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers et al., respondents in No. 298. David L. Holland for respondents in No. 311.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. . Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 268 F. 2d 54.