Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second District of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. Munson G. Shaw, Lawrence Daly, and Arthur E. Howell, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Alex D. Shaw & Co., Defendants in Error, 1927 — 20 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Tax
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second District of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. Munson G. Shaw, Lawrence Daly, and Arthur E. Howell, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Alex D. Shaw & Co., Defendants in Error
20 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Before MANTON and L. HAND, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second District of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. Munson G. Shaw, Lawrence Daly, and Arthur E. Howell, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Alex D. Shaw & Co., Defendants in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 6, 1927.
No. 282.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Writ of error to the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs sued to recover taxes paid under -the provisions of section 304 of the Revenue Act of 1917 (Comp. St. § 5986c). Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Charles Lincoln Sylvester, Asst. U. S. Atty., óf New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Barnes, McKenna & Halstead, of New York City (Bernard C. McKenna and James M. Snee, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.
Before MANTON and L. HAND, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed on the authority of Fleischmann Mfg. Co. v. Irwin, etc. (C. C. A.) 5 F.(2d) 167, and Mayes v. Paul Jones & Co. (C. C. A.) 270 F. 121.
Judgment affirmed.