Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Susan Gorden, Appellant, v. Joseph Gorden et al., Respondents, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 549 · caselaw · US
General
Susan Gorden, Appellant, v. Joseph Gorden et al., Respondents
179 N.Y. 549·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Susan Gorden, Appellant, v. Joseph Gorden et al., Respondents.
Go'deiiv. Gorden, 80 App. Div. 358, affirmed.
(Argued June 14, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 28, 1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action for the admeasurement of dower.
George W. McKenzie for appellant.
Willimn P. Pickett, James 0. Miller, Edward I. Somerville and James A. Sheehan for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion helow.
■Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.