General
Harriet Fifield, Appellant, v. The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent
137 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harriet Fifield, Appellant, v. The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued January 17, 1893;
decided February 7, 1893.)
. Appeal from judgment'of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo, entered upon an order mide December 28, 1891, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions, denied a motion for a new trial, and ordered judgment in favor of defendant upon a verdict.
Seward A. Simons for appellant.
John G. Milbur for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of Fifield v. N. Y., I. & W. R. Co. (125 N. Y. 704).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.