General
Herman C. WECHSLER, Doing Business, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
13 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Herman C. WECHSLER, Doing Business, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 2, 1926.)
No. 339.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Thomas & Friedman, of New York City (S. P. Friedman and Joseph H. Hazen, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (H. T. Stiehman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed in open court.