Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Richardson, 1911 — 220 U.S. 601 · caselaw · US
General
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Richardson
220 U.S. 601·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM FEBRUARY 21 TO MAY 29, 1911.
No. 532.
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. W. Richardson.
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 27,1911.
Decided March 6, 1911.
Mr. Joseph W. Bailey and Mr. Rice Maxey for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36; Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad Company v. Turnipseed, Administrator, &c., 219 U. S. 35. Mr. Cecil H. Smith, Mr.. James Hagerman and Mr. Joseph M. Bryson for the plaintiff in error.