Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Magnolia Petroleum Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission, 1957 — 352 U.S. 968 · caselaw · US
General
Magnolia Petroleum Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission
352 U.S. 968·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 558.
Magnolia Petroleum Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission.
Charles B. Wallace and John E. McClure for the Magnolia Petroleum Co., Cullen R. Liskow for the Superior Oil Co., Clayton L. Orn, Robert M. Vaughan, James D. Parriott, W. H. Everett, C. F. Currier and Robert E. May for the Ohio Oil Co., and Jacques P. Adoue for West, petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter, William W. Ross, Willard W. Gatchell and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.