Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burke v. Georgia, 1950 — 338 U.S. 941 · caselaw · US
General
Burke v. Georgia
338 U.S. 941·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 176, Misc.
Burke v. Georgia.
Paul Crutchfield for petitioner.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
This is a petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia affirming denial of a motion to set aside a conviction made on the ground that into the conviction entered perjured testimony knowingly used by the prosecution. 205 Ga. 502, 54 S. E. 2d 348. Assuming that this decision denies to petitioner any relief whatever in the state courts unless the requirements of § 110-706 of the Georgia Code are satisfied, the petition for writ of certiorari is herewith denied, without prejudice to petitioner to seek in the appropriate United States District Court in Georgia whatever relief, if any, may be required by Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.