Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginius Ballard et al., as Assignees of Brodie L. Duke, for the Benefit of Creditors, Appellants, v. Alven Beveridge, Respondent, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Virginius Ballard et al., as Assignees of Brodie L. Duke, for the Benefit of Creditors, Appellants, v. Alven Beveridge, Respondent
155 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virginius Ballard et al., as Assignees of Brodie L. Duke, for the Benefit of Creditors, Appellants, v. Alven Beveridge, Respondent.
Ballard v. Beveridge, 6 App. Div. 349, appeal withdrawn.
(Argued February 28, 1898;
decided March 8, 1898.)
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 5, 1896, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the order of reversal not showing on its face that no question of fact was involved, an application for its amendment had been made to the Appellate Division and denied.
Sullivan d; Gromwell for motion.
Drnid MeOlure opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, with costs of the appeal to the respondent, and ten dollars costs of motion.