Tax
Nathaniel C. Foster, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Rowe, Impleaded, etc.
207 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 451.
Nathaniel C. Foster, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Rowe, Impleaded, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 28, 1907.
Decided November 4, 1907.
Mr. W. M. Tomkins for plaintiff in error. Mr. James Wickham for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Foster v. Rowe, 128 Wisconsin, 326; S. C., 111 N. W. Rep. 688; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Indiana Manufacturing Company v. Koehne, 186 U. S. 681; State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575.